Vietnam: Between Superpowers
Vietnam: Between Superpowers
Vietnam finds itself at the center of the trade conflict between the United States and China. Vietnamese equities are historically undervalued. Over a five-year horizon, active funds have outperformed passive strategies.
It is no easy task for To Lam, Vietnam’s de facto top political leader as General Secretary of the Communist Party, to navigate between the two global powers—the U.S. and China. The Southeast Asian nation has not been spared from the tough stance of the U.S. President: Donald Trump imposed tariffs of up to 46 percent on Vietnamese imports. Lam responded swiftly, given that the United States is one of the country’s most important export destinations.
Just a few days later, he held a phone call with Trump and proposed, among other things, a reciprocal reduction in tariffs from the Vietnamese side. A document from the Ministry of Industry and Trade now reportedly confirms that Vietnam intends to take action against illegal transshipment of goods into the United States. While the tariffs are currently on hold, Trump’s 90-day suspension expires in early July.
On the other side of the conflict stands China—Vietnam’s second major trading partner. In a recent meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping, the two nations signed numerous bilateral cooperation agreements, thereby deepening their trade relations.
Xi explicitly called for stronger supply chains between the two countries. “Vietnam’s foreign policy, which aims to remain open to all sides—including the U.S. and China—is being put to the test,” summarizes Ulrich Stephan, Chief Investment Strategist at Deutsche Bank.
Strong Ambitions Amid Fragile Balance
And yet things had been going so well. Vietnam, which is still classified as a frontier market—one tier below emerging markets—aims to become an industrialized nation by 2045. The government wants to reduce bureaucracy and create more space for investment.
The official growth target for 2025 is eight percent, after the country already achieved seven percent in 2024. The World Bank is slightly more cautious in its forecast, projecting growth of 6.8 percent in 2025 and 6.45 percent in 2026. “These strong growth prospects are primarily driven by demand and exports in the technology sector,” explains Stephan. “In addition, Vietnam is rated positively as a destination for foreign investment. It could outpace other Asian neighbors in growth thanks to a combination of exports, investment, and robust domestic consumption.”
Now it is up to General Secretary Lam to walk the tightrope between the two superpowers. Should he succeed, Vietnam might even benefit from the tariff dispute, as more countries could look to diversify their supply chains and include Vietnam. However, if he fails, there could be significant economic consequences: exports to the U.S. account for roughly 30 percent of Vietnam’s GDP.
Investor Uncertainty and Valuation Gaps
This uncertainty is also reflected in the stock market. The MSCI Vietnam Index—which tracks the 63 largest Vietnamese companies—is currently trading nearly 20 percent below its 10-year valuation average.
“Indices are reacting to global concerns around tariffs, even though the largest Vietnamese companies are not in the tech sector but in more traditional industries like steel, real estate development, banking, and food,” explains Stephan. Based on historical price-to-earnings ratios, the MSCI Vietnam Index still appears ambitiously valued, posting a P/E ratio of nearly 18 as of the end of March.
Limited Retail Access—But Strong Fund Alternatives
It remains difficult for retail investors to trade Vietnamese stocks directly. Most brokers do not offer access to the Ho Chi Minh Stock Exchange (HOSE), and individual stocks from frontier markets are considered high-risk. Investment funds provide a much easier and more diversified entry point.
One of the largest and most well-known actively managed options is the Lumen Vietnam Fund from Swiss investment firm Aquis Capital. With USD 348 million in assets under management, it is one of the heavyweights in the space and has been active since its inception in 2012.
Over this period, the fund has delivered an annualized return of 9.5 percent (as of March 31). Even more impressively, the five-year average annual return stands at 18 percent. However, this comes at a cost: a front-end load of up to 3 percent and ongoing charges of 2.45 percent make it one of the more expensive options.
A slightly more affordable option is the Galileo Vietnam Fund from Luxembourg-based asset manager IP Concept. While the ongoing charges are around 2 percent, the fund is much smaller in scale, with approximately USD 86 million in assets. In terms of performance, it also lags behind, posting an annualized five-year return of 14 percent.
For those seeking a passive alternative, there is the Xtrackers FTSE Vietnam Swap ETF, which synthetically replicates the FTSE Vietnam Index. With a total expense ratio of just 0.85 percent, it is significantly cheaper than the active funds and manages around USD 265 million in assets—positioned between the two active strategies.
However, its performance has disappointed: over the past five years, the ETF has posted an average annual loss of 1.2 percent. It appears that active management continues to provide real added value—particularly in less liquid markets such as Vietnam.
Source: von Selma Schmitt, Handelsblatt
Photo: AFP

